Semicircular Edge Notch in Semi-infinite Plate under Tension

Stresses around a semicircular notch of radius ρ on the straight free edge of a semi-infinite plate under uniform tension σ = Nyy / t parallel to the edge (Maunsell 1936, Ling 1947: Kt = 3.065 at the notch root). The field is the Muskhelishvili series with the straight edge traction-free exactly, carried to convergence: the stress components, principal stresses and maximum shear at a user input point, the hoop stress along the notch with Kt at the root, the stresses on the root line and along the free edge, and the stress field around the notch.

  • Semicircular notch on the free edge of a semi-infinite plate under tension parallel to the edge

  • Stress components, principal stresses and principal angle at a user input point

  • Hoop stress along the notch, Kt = 3.065 at the root, stresses on the root line and along the free edge

  • Fringe plots and line plots of the stress field around the notch

Load and Notch Geometry


Unit System: /

Convention

Semi-infinite plate with a free edge on x = 0 and a semicircular notch of radius rho under tension along y; point P at (r, theta) about the notch center, theta from the y axis

Load, Thickness and Notch




Stress State Location



×

Semicircular Edge Notch in Semi-infinite Plate under Tension

Semicircular Edge Notch in a Semi-infinite Plate under Tension

Problem Statement

A large thin plate of thickness t has a straight free edge (the line x = 0, plate at x > 0) with a semicircular notch of radius ρ cut into it, centered on the edge. Far from the notch the plate carries a uniform tension σ = Nyy/t parallel to the edge; this is the only uniform far-field state a free edge admits, since a normal or shear stress at infinity would load the edge. The questions are the stress at a point P(r, θ) about the notch center, θ measured from the load axis y towards x (into the plate), the hoop stress along the notch with the factor Kt = σroot/σ at the root θ = 90°, and the stresses on the root line and along the free edge.

Semi-infinite plate with a semicircular edge notch under tension along the edge

Figure A: Convention. The free edge is x = 0, the load acts along y, and θ runs from 0 (corner) through 90° (root) to 180° (the other corner), the same angle convention as the hole tools.

Key Assumptions

Semi-infinite plate, linear elastic, plane stress, exactly semicircular notch, tension parallel to the edge. The notch and the straight edge are traction-free. The solution does not depend on the elastic constants (it is the same in plane strain). The material stays elastic at the root. A strip of finite width, a second notch on the opposite edge, a U-notch deeper than its radius or a load with bending are outside the tool (Peterson's Charts 2.2–2.5 cover them; the present value is their limit for a notch small against the width).

Series Solution with an Exactly Free Edge

With the potentials Φ(z) and Ψ(z) the stresses are σxx + σyy = 4 Re Φ and σyy − σxx + 2iτxy = 2[z̅ Φ′ + Ψ] (in the solver's frame, with the edge on the real axis and the plate below it). The traction on the straight edge is σyy − iσxy = Φ + Φ̅ + conj(z̅Φ′ + Ψ). Writing Φ̅(z) = conj Φ(z̅), the condition that the whole line be free is an identity between analytic functions, which Muskhelishvili's continuation across the boundary solves at once:

Ψ(z) = −Φ̅(z) − Φ(z) − zΦ′(z).

So only Φ is unknown, and Ψ must be analytic in the plate, which requires Φ to be analytic both in the plate and in its mirror image above the edge, that is, everywhere outside the circle |z| = ρ. Hence Φ(z) = σ/4 + ∑n≥1 an z−n, a Laurent series about the notch center, with an real for even n and imaginary for odd n by the symmetry about the root line; the straight edge is then free identically, the far field is the uniform tension, and the Laurent coefficients are found by imposing σrr = σrθ = 0 at 2N + 40 points of a quarter of the notch in a least-squares sense. The notch meets the edge in two free 90° corners, where the stresses vanish; the series converges algebraically there and geometrically elsewhere, so N = 60 terms are kept (root value 3.0413, 3.0622, 3.0657, 3.0653, 3.0653 for N = 10, 20, 40, 60, 100). Maunsell (1936) and Ling (1947) solved the same problem with biharmonic series in the Airy function.

Results

Table 1: Hoop stress along the notch and stresses nearby, in units of the far-field tension σ
locationvalue / σ
notch root, θ = 90° (Kt)3.065
notch, θ = 60° and 120°2.146
notch, θ = 30° and 150°0.441
notch, θ = 10° and 170°−0.047
corners, θ = 0 and 180°0
free edge, y = 1.2ρ / 2ρ / 3ρ / 5ρ−0.040 / 0.367 / 0.680 / 0.877

The root carries 3.065 σ, 2 % more than Kirsch's hole, because the free edge removes the restraint of the material on the open side. The hoop stress falls to zero at the corners and is slightly compressive next to them; along the free edge the stress is zero at the corner, dips to −0.04 σ and returns to σ within a few radii. The disturbance decays as 1/r² with no resultant force (the 1/z coefficient of the series is zero).

Checks

The traction on the straight edge is zero to round-off at every point by construction; the root-mean-square traction left on the notch is 1.3 × 10−4 σ for N = 60 (largest next to the corners); the resultant of the tractions on large semicircles of 5, 50 and 500 radii is zero to 10−5 (equilibrium) and the field tends to the uniform tension as 1/r²; the corner stresses tend to zero as the order rises (0.013, 0.006, 0.003, 0.0007 σ for N = 20, 40, 60, 100). The root factor 3.065 agrees with Ling (1947) as quoted by Peterson (Chart 2.2) and with Maunsell's 3.05.

Limitations

The notch is exactly semicircular and centered on the edge; U-notches of other depth, V-notches and notches in a strip of finite width are different problems (Peterson's Charts 2.2 to 2.5; the strip with two opposite semicircular notches was solved by Ling 1947 and Isida 1953). Only the tension parallel to the edge is admissible as a uniform far field; in-plane bending of a notched beam is not covered. The stresses are those of the elastic plate; the elastic root stress exceeds the yield strength of most metals at modest loads.




References

Ling, C. B. (1947). "On the Stresses in a Notched Strip". Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 14, pp. A275–A280. Series solution for a strip with two opposite semicircular notches under tension; its limit for a small notch, the semi-infinite plate, gives Kt = 3.065 at the root, the value the tool reproduces (3.0653).

Maunsell, F. G. (1936). "Stresses in a Notched Plate under Tension". Philosophical Magazine, Series 7, Vol. 21, pp. 765–773. The first solution of the semicircular notch on the edge of a semi-infinite plate under tension parallel to the edge (Kt ≈ 3.05 with the series then available).

Isida, M. (1953). "On the Tension of the Strip with Semi-Circular Notches". Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 19, No. 83, pp. 5–12. Perturbation solution for the notched strip and a review of Ling's strip values; the semi-infinite limit is unchanged.

Pilkey, W. D., and Pilkey, D. F. (2008). Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken. Chapter 2, "Notches and Grooves", Section 2.3.1 and Chart 2.2: semicircular and U-shaped edge notches in a semi-infinite plate under tension (Kt = 3.065 for the semicircle) and Chart 2.3 for the strip with opposite semicircular notches.

Muskhelishvili, N. I. (1953). Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. Noordhoff, Groningen. The complex potentials and the continuation across a straight traction-free boundary, Ψ(z) = −Φ̅(z) − Φ(z) − zΦ′(z), on which the tool's series is built (the straight edge is then free identically and only the notch surface is fitted).

Timoshenko, S. P., and Goodier, J. N. (1970). Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. Chapter 4: the Kirsch hole, Kt = 3, which the semicircular notch exceeds slightly because the free edge removes the restraint on the open side.


DISCLAIMER: The methods and calculation on aNOWysis.com are provided as means to educate the reader. There is no warranty, expessed or implied, as to the relevance or accuracy of the methods or calculations. All calculations should be checked by a qualified analyst for appropriateness and accuracy. We will not be held liable for any damages, injuries or deaths caused by using methods or calculations from this site.